↓ Skip to Main Content

Secondary Navigation

Tag: polarization

U.S. House polarization w/ Bailey ideal points

By L.J Zigerell Posted on December 5, 2022 Posted in Methods No Comments Tagged with polarization

I saw a discussion on Twitter about claims of asymmetric polarization in the U.S. Congress, and I figured it was worth updating a prior analysis using Bailey ideal points:

Plot without disaggregation of Democrats:

---

NOTES

1. Michael Bailey's data page, with a discussion of his method

2. Description of my method for the above plots

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 41 other subscribers

Links

POL 138
POL 497
Curriculum vitae
Google Scholar profile
Dataverse page
Data sharers
R gallery
Survey weighting in R
Workshops
Resumes

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Categories

  • Academia
  • Evolution
  • Law and courts
  • Methods
  • Miscellany
  • Misperceptions
  • Peer review
  • Plot improvement
  • Public opinion
  • Race
  • Religious groups
  • Reproductions
  • Science knowledge
  • Sex
  • Student evaluations of teaching
  • Teaching
  • Uncategorized

Tags

2017 YouGov survey academia anes apsr bad peer review cces citations climate change evolution file drawer problem Holman et al. 2019 list hostile sexism inequality intelligence list experiment media bias methods misinformation misperceptions monkey cage New York Times plot improvement polarization political knowledge pottery barn rule preregistration public opinion R race racial resentment replications reproductions Rice et al. 2021 JOP science literacy selective reporting sex SPSS Stata Supreme Court survey response symbolic racism teaching TESS twitter response you're doing it wrong

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 41 other subscribers

Blogroll

Daily Howler
Rotoworld
Sabermetric Research
Slate Star Codex

Pages

  • Survey weighting in R
  • Workshops

Twitter Feed

My Tweets

Categories

  • Academia
  • Evolution
  • Law and courts
  • Methods
  • Miscellany
  • Misperceptions
  • Peer review
  • Plot improvement
  • Public opinion
  • Race
  • Religious groups
  • Reproductions
  • Science knowledge
  • Sex
  • Student evaluations of teaching
  • Teaching
  • Uncategorized

Tags

2017 YouGov survey academia anes apsr bad peer review cces citations climate change evolution file drawer problem Holman et al. 2019 list hostile sexism inequality intelligence list experiment media bias methods misinformation misperceptions monkey cage New York Times plot improvement polarization political knowledge pottery barn rule preregistration public opinion R race racial resentment replications reproductions Rice et al. 2021 JOP science literacy selective reporting sex SPSS Stata Supreme Court survey response symbolic racism teaching TESS twitter response you're doing it wrong

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
Copyright © 2026 | Powered by Responsive Theme